Pending the analysis of the B sample and further investigations, I will not comment. I would urge everyone to respect this and to give me and my family the time and opportunity to get more clarity first.
The last part is something that we hear from people wanting to mourn in private, for example. A truly innocent person would be outraged at the injustice, racking their brains what could have happened - did a competitor trick him? Is the doctor an agent of his competition? Anything that would explain to him what really happened. He would be offering alternative scenarios - the samples must have been mixed up, the readings are wrong, the tech person is incompetent - anything to clear his name.
All of that is missing. He is using moral high ground - the good guy principle - and does not accuse the "real" perpetrator.
You raise a good point. There is no anger, it's very much an acceptance and a feeling that process is going to be followed (ie the lawyers will try and muddy everything as best they can)
Exactly. He knew he had to say something - just keeping silent is not acceptable and points to guilt. He tried to distance himself as much as he could - concluding with: now go away and leave me alone. He's no Lance Armstrong going all guns blazing - he's hoping that it will miraculously go away, since by no fault of his own his world has been turned upside down. Now the same unknown force should turn it back, right?
Pending the analysis of the B sample and further investigations, I will not comment. I would urge everyone to respect this and to give me and my family the time and opportunity to get more clarity first.
The last part is something that we hear from people wanting to mourn in private, for example. A truly innocent person would be outraged at the injustice, racking their brains what could have happened - did a competitor trick him? Is the doctor an agent of his competition? Anything that would explain to him what really happened. He would be offering alternative scenarios - the samples must have been mixed up, the readings are wrong, the tech person is incompetent - anything to clear his name.
All of that is missing. He is using moral high ground - the good guy principle - and does not accuse the "real" perpetrator.
You raise a good point. There is no anger, it's very much an acceptance and a feeling that process is going to be followed (ie the lawyers will try and muddy everything as best they can)
Exactly. He knew he had to say something - just keeping silent is not acceptable and points to guilt. He tried to distance himself as much as he could - concluding with: now go away and leave me alone. He's no Lance Armstrong going all guns blazing - he's hoping that it will miraculously go away, since by no fault of his own his world has been turned upside down. Now the same unknown force should turn it back, right?